HomeCar CultureCommentaryWill fourth time be the charm for Jensen's return?

Will fourth time be the charm for Jensen’s return?


The Jensen Interceptor is the GT car that is not willing to die. Yet again a new group has taken the reigns to revive the Jensen brand and its first effort is a new model called the Jensen GT.

Over the years, no fewer than four different groups have attempted to revive this world-class GT car brand, though with little success. Is this latest effort the one that will be a success?

The tale of the Jensen Interceptor is a long and complicated one. From the start the car was enveloped in controversy. The founders of Jensen actually left the company during the car’s original production run. The cars were terrific grand touring cars, to many the equal of Aston Martin, but the brand never developed the following its more famous countryman.

A lot of this has to do with the mythology of the Aston brand when compared to that of Jensen. Aston has a racing heritage, which did much to feed this mythology. The placement of its cars as movie hero James Bond’s car of choice in no less than nine different 007 films did nothing but bolster this mythology.

I think that Jensen very much missed the boat on this all important brand-building mythology because back in the 1970s the Interceptor was very much a car to have and was owned by countless stars of film, music, and even motorcycle racers and race car drivers. My personal Interceptor was owned originally by none other than actor Tony Curtis.

Sadly, the company never capitalized on this star-studded owner list, nor did it promote itself as much as it might have. As a result, the Interceptor was largely forgotten.

The latest effort is by a company called the Jensen Group, led by entrepreneur Tim Hearley. From 1981 through 1984, Hearley served as joint chairman of Aston Martin Lagonda. Next, he was a director of, “a business specializing in the restoration of Jensen Interceptor cars,” according to a Jensen Group news release.

In 2009, Hearley founded Jensen Cars Ltd., which after much legal action acquired the rights to the Jensen and Interceptor names.

Obviously, these experiences add up to a great brand ambassador for a new Jensen and someone who may finally be able to bring a new Interceptor to the market in the way that will finally revive this great marque.

I will admit that I am a huge fan of the Jensen Interceptor and have owned one.

‘The Interceptor has always made a nice alternative to the Aston Martin V8 cars of the 1970s and ‘80s for a more realistic price. That low price may soon be a thing of the past, however, as interest in the Jensen Interceptor by the collector car market has been increasing of late, with prices on the rise as other cars in the category have had huge price increases and buyers started to look for more affordable alternatives to cars like the Aston Martin, Iso Griffo and Facel Vega.

Rear three-quarters view of the new Jensen GT
Rear three-quarters view of the new Jensen GT

The big question is: Can a car like the Interceptor, a low-production car from the start, actually be successful in today’s marketplace and sell in enough volume for the company to actually stay in business?

Well, if you look at the large number of low-production cars currently being marketed and sold in record numbers — think McLaren and Paganni — then it could be that the timing for a new Interceptor launch couldn’t be better.

The clay models of the new Jensen GT displayed definitely look the part of a modern Interceptor. We have high hopes that Mr. Hearley may be exactly the kind of person who can revive this storied brand.signature


Andy Reid
Andy Reid
Andy Reid's first car, purchased at age 15, was a 1968 Fiat 124 coupe. His second, obtained by spending his college savings fund, was a 1966 Ferrari 330 GT 2+2. Since then, he has owned more than 150 cars—none of them normal or reasonable—as well as numerous classic motorcycles and scooters. A veteran of film, television, advertising and helping to launch a few Internet-based companies, Reid was a columnist for Classic Motorsports magazine for 12 years and has written for several other publications. He is considered an expert in European sports and luxury cars and is a respected concours judge. He lives in Canton, Connecticut.


  1. beautiful car. The rear is perfect and the front is perfect. I wish the company my best. i would like to see ,this car be successful.

  2. absolutely nothing really written in you Jensen article to even suggest that a new car is even close to production… no engine,trans.interior.. sounds like more Hearley pipe dreams..

  3. i do hope the car if it becomes successful that the price is affordable. After seeing cars explode in prices around auction times, it pains me to see many of us who love vintage automobiles priced out of the market and our ability to even consider one. for example i have been watching 1955 chevy two doors become unaffordable to the average person. When you reach retirement age the thought of owning one of your dreams dies, I had wanted a real hot rod since i was 14 and saw my first one a 41 ford sedan with all the goodies. At the age of seventy years of age now, that dream has faded. The price of rods has skyrocketed into the 30 to 60k market. i wish all of you who have sent time building a car good result, some of us have not the know how to do this or the tools if we did..i do like looking at the cars and always enjoy them..

  4. Really not sure about this. Muscle car front grille, Jaguar F-Type rear lights, Aston-Martin-esque front fenders and a tail that is too long and droops worse than an Aurora. It definitely hasn’t been designed by the best in the business, and will end up like most forgotten or small-scale builders – an afterthought.

    This is at least the second time I’ve seen a born-again Jensen. Why doesn’t someone like Aston just buy the brand and do it properly? To start it needs the ridiculous but oh-so evocative rear glasshouse screen. Then it’s a proper Jensen.

  5. I am sure that a new Jensen will be much appreciated but have to agree that the rear is a tad to long and I prefer a slightly wider or bigger front headlamp area / mouth that’s more agressive. I have a collection of Jensens but only the convertible is in very good shape, the others need complete restoration which would make them way above what the market will accept. Good luck to the new company and if they get it right I shall be a customer! Happy New year to all!

Comments are closed.

- Advertisment -